Objection!: How the Arizona Rules of Evidence Affect the Arizona Election Litigation

Arizona State Law Journal Blog
By Joel Truett.The CaseIn the wake of this year’s presidential election, President Trump promised to take legal action to challenge the counting of the vote in several states.  Cases have been brought across the country, with supporters of the President continuing to argue that failures in vote counting or voter fraud were responsible for Joe Biden’s lead. Here in Arizona, the Trump campaign brought a case in Maricopa County alleging that they had evidence of “overvotes” being handled improperly  on election day. They argued that this was evidence of systematic errors in counting the vote that affected the election results. While this case was later withdrawn by the campaign, the hearing held on November 12 served as an interesting look at how the rules of evidence can influence election cases.…
Read More

A Parent’s Constitutional Right to Visitation and Association…. from Prison?

Arizona State Law Journal Blog
By Stephanie Deskins.On September 22, 2020, the Arizona Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case of Jessie D. v Department of Child Safety, F.V., M.D., M.D., C.D. The juvenile court terminated Jessie’s parental rights to his four children because he is currently serving seven years in prison. On appeal, the Arizona Court of Appeals agreed with the juvenile court’s decision. The Arizona Supreme Court granted Jessie’s Petition for Review, and their upcoming decision could impact the parental rights of other incarcerated individuals and clarify the extent of DCS’ legal obligation to encourage and support the reuniting of families.  THE FACTSAfter one of Jessie’s children accidentally burned down their family home in August of 2016, his four children and their mother stayed at a UMOM homeless shelter. Because Jessie had…
Read More

Is Wrongful Imprisonment Worth Something?

Arizona State Law Journal Blog
It is hard to think of something more patently unfair than a person being convicted and imprisoned for a crime they did not commit. But that is exactly what happened in 1980 to Cathy Woods. Cathy spent nearly thirty-four years in prison in Nevada after falsely confessing to the murder of a woman, which she did in an attempt to get a better room at the psychiatric hospital where she was a patient. Despite her history of mental illness and other false claims she made—including that she worked for the FBI and that her mother was poisoning her—she was convicted and sentenced to life without the possibility of parole. It was not until 2014 that her conviction was vacated due to new DNA evidence that failed to tie her to…
Read More

Expungement Reform in Arizona: The Empirical Case for a Clean Slate

2020, Past Issues, Print, Volume 52 (2020) Issue 3 (Fall)
Sonja B. Starr* Full Article. Introduction In the past several years, dozens of states have adopted or expanded laws providing for expungement of some adult criminal convictions.[1] Several states have recently passed groundbreaking “Clean Slate” legislation, which makes expungement automatic for those who meet the legal requirements.[2] Arizona, currently, is one of the holdouts to this trend—it not only has no automatic expungement law but indeed does not even allow expungement by petition. Although Arizona has a procedure to “set aside” a conviction,[3] this procedure does not seal the record and does not give the individual the right to refuse to disclose it.[4] In this Article, I draw on my recent empirical research to argue that Arizona should join its sister states in offering a second chance to people with…
Read More

Reforming Sentencing Policies and Practices in Arizona

2020, Past Issues, Print, Volume 52 (2020) Issue 3 (Fall)
Cassia Spohn. The early 1970s witnessed calls for reductions in state and federal prison populations and predictions that the use of incarceration would decline. For example, in 1973 the National Advisory Commission on Criminal Justice Standards and Goals, which concluded that “[t]he prison, the reformatory, and the jail have achieved only a shocking record of failure,” recommended that “no new institutions for adults should be built and existing institutions for juveniles should be closed.” These calls for reductions in the use of incarceration, however, fell on deaf ears. Rather than declining, America’s imprisonment rate, which had fluctuated around a mean of 110 individuals per 100,000 population for most of the twentieth century, increased every year from 1975 to 2007. In fact, the state and federal prison population increased from 300,000…
Read More

The Incentives of Private Prisons

2020, Past Issues, Print, Volume 52 (2020) Issue 3 (Fall)
John F. Pfaff* Full Article. Introduction Few institutions in our deeply flawed and troubled criminal justice system draw as much immediate ire as private prisons. In his 2016 campaign for the Democratic presidential nomination, for example, Senator Bernie Sanders’s first stab at a criminal justice reform platform was to sponsor a (surely unconstitutional) bill banning private prisons in the state and federal systems alike.[1] The 2020 campaign for the Democratic presidential nomination similarly saw multiple candidates make pledges about private prisons, while none gave any real attention to the specifics of publicly run institutions.[2] This persistent focus on private prisons by politicians and the public alike is misguided for at least two reasons. First, it significantly overstates the role that privatization plays in the U.S. prison system.[3] All told, only…
Read More

Homelessness, Indignity, and the Promise of Mandatory Citations for Urban Camping

2020, Past Issues, Print, Volume 52 (2020) Issue 3 (Fall)
Ben A. McJunkin* Full Article. Introduction To be homeless in Arizona is to be a criminal. City ordinances across the state prohibit broad swaths of conduct that make merely existing in public spaces difficult for those who lack housing. As a result, Arizonans experiencing homelessness commit countless crimes every day out of necessity, including loitering in parks,[1] resting at bus stops,[2] obstructing sidewalks,[3] pitching tents,[4] asking for money,[5] asking for work,[6] and sleeping just about anywhere.[7] At the state level, Arizona law prohibits loitering, littering, and public nuisances, the last of which is frequently invoked to justify sweeping and dismantling homeless encampments.[8] As prohibitions on the homeless experience proliferate, so too does Arizona’s homeless population. The state has experienced consistent year-over-year increases in the number of individuals experiencing homelessness, many…
Read More

Arizona’s Sex Offender Laws: Recommendations for Reform

2020, Past Issues, Print, Volume 52 (2020) Issue 3 (Fall)
Tamara Rice Lave* Full Article. Introduction In this Article, I consider ways in which Arizona’s laws regarding sex offenders should be reformed. I begin by focusing on laws that are designed to deal with the danger posed by convicted sex offenders: registration requirements, residence restrictions, and civil commitment. I contend that the state has overstated the risk posed by convicted sex offenders and that the laws meant to control them may do more harm than good. Next, I turn to police sexual violence. I argue that the state needs to go further in criminalizing this abhorrent conduct in order to promote the rule of law and protect vulnerable persons. I. Laws Designed To Control Convicted Sex Offenders I start this Part by considering the motive for laws controlling sex offenders:…
Read More

Vulnerable and Valued: Protecting Youth from the Perils of Custodial Interrogation

2020, Past Issues, Print, Volume 52 (2020) Issue 3 (Fall)
Kristin Henning* & Rebba Omer** Full Article. Introduction It had been four long days since the baby died and Lacresha Murray had last been allowed to see or talk to her grandparents, who adopted her when she was two.[1]Now she was sitting in a small room with an angry police officer looming over her, the gun at his waist directly at her eye level. She did not have much experience talking to police officers, but she had seen the police stop and search other Black people, and she had heard her grandparents tell her older sister that she should always do exactly what officers say. “Get home safe,” Lacresha remembered her grandparents telling her sister every time they talked about the police. Now, Lacresha did not know how she would…
Read More

Advancing Bail and Pretrial Justice Reform in Arizona

2020, Past Issues, Print, Volume 52 (2020) Issue 3 (Fall)
Henry F. Fradella** & Christine S. Scott-Hayward*** Full Article. I. Introduction In its 2017 “State of Pretrial Justice in America” report, the Pretrial Justice Institute (“PJI”) praised Arizona’s pretrial justice reform efforts.[1] Arizona was one of nine states awarded a “B” grade (only one state—New Jersey—received an “A” grade).[2] Arizona was also named a “state to watch.”[3] Other commentators and news outlets have highlighted Arizona’s efforts and argue that it is one of the jurisdictions at the forefront of bail reform.[4] Although we agree that Arizona has taken some key steps toward creating a just and effective bail system,[5] more needs to be done before the state becomes a true leader in pretrial justice. Arizona remains a state with high numbers of unconvicted people in its jails.[6] Of the approximately…
Read More