Versari Crimes

2021, Past Issues, Print, Volume 53 (2021) Issue 2 (Summer)
Stephen P. Garvey Jonathan Stamp had a gun and a blackjack. Around a quarter to eleven a.m. on October 26, 1965, he entered the rear of the building housing the General Amusement Company’s offices. Together with Michael Koory, he was looking for cash. The employees were told to go to the front.4 Stamp then went to the office of Carl Honeyman, the company’s owner and general manager. Honeyman was sixty years old and overweight, with a history of heart disease. The amusement business, intensely competitive, added to the stress. Full Article.
Read More

Conspiracy, Complicity, and the Scope of Contemplated Crime

2021, Past Issues, Print, Volume 53 (2021) Issue 2 (Summer)
Kimberly Kessler Ferzan One of the leading casebooks for the first-year Criminal Law course begins the mens rea discussion with Regina v. Cunningham.1 Cunningham, in need of money, decided to rip the gas meter off the residential gas pipe in his soon-to-be basement to steal the shillings inside. That Cunningham was guilty of theft was uncontroversial. The problem was that Cunningham did not turn off the gas, and it seeped into the adjacent home, partially asphyxiating the neighbor, Sarah Wade. Although the case is technically about the interpretation of the word “maliciously” in the Offences against the Person Act, the lesson students are to draw from it is broader: each crime should stand on its own culpability. The criminality inherent in being a thief is not the criminality inherent in…
Read More

Judicial Application of Strict Liability Local Ordinances

2021, Past Issues, Print, Volume 53 (2021) Issue 2 (Summer)
Guyora Binder & Brenner Fissell The criminal code reform movement inspired by the Model Penal Code had, among other goals, the aim of eliminating strict liability offenses. The success of the movement resulted in the enactment of the Model Penal Code’s scheme of element analysis and default culpability terms in about half of American jurisdictions. Around the same time, though, a similar reform movement was occurring in local government law: the home rule movement, which advocated for greater political power for municipalities—including the power to criminalize conduct. Full Article.
Read More

The Depths of Malice

2021, Past Issues, Print, Volume 53 (2021) Issue 2 (Summer)
Vera Bergelson. The Model Penal Code (“MPC”) revision of the traditional mens rea provisions has been almost uniformly recognized as an immense success. The MPC has clarified and simplified mens rea categories by replacing numerous amorphous terms with just four rigorously defined mental states and provided default rules for the interpretation of those mental states as applied to each material element of an offense. The MPC framework has been extremely influential: it “has been adopted explicitly in more than half of American jurisdictions, and it often [guides] judicial interpretation [of mens rea] in the remaining jurisdictions as well.”3 However, the MPC may have lost some important insights in departing from the traditional mens rea criteria. In this paper, I suggest that, in its strive for simplification, rationality, and utility, the…
Read More

Flavored E-Cigarettes: Dangerously Defective or Scrumpdiddlyumptious?

Arizona State Law Journal Blog
By Spencer Shockness. Who can take a sunrise? Sprinkle it with dew? Add a taste of chocolate and make an e-cigarette or two? Not the Candy Man, nowadays, but the large vape brands can. The modern state of the tobacco industry encourages us to ask the question: are flavored e-cigarettes a dangerous threat to the American youth? As of 2021, the FDA has denied marketing applications for over 946,000 flavored e-cigarette products citing the dangers presented by youth usage of these products. The Agency has issued marketing denials left and right for products featuring flavors such as Apple Crumble, Cinnamon Toast Cereal, and more. However, the Agency has yet to rule on the marketing applications from some of the major e-cigarette manufacturers. One e-cigarette company whose flavored products are popular…
Read More

Food Truck Freedom, or Problematic State Preemption?

Arizona State Law Journal Blog
By Sean Krieg. In October 2021, the Mayor, Councilmembers, and City Manager of Mesa received a threat. It was not sent by an anonymous troublemaker nor was it from a disgruntled citizen. Instead, it was sent by three members of the Arizona State Legislature. They were threatening to withhold all of the state-shared revenue owed to the City of Mesa—a sum of more than $190 million in the current fiscal year. What possible reason could the legislature have for threatening to torpedo the budget of one of the largest cities in Arizona? Food trucks. The three legislators claimed that a Mesa zoning interpretation, which suggested restrictions on a large-scale food truck operation located a few feet from residential property, violated Arizona’s “Food Truck Freedom” bill, passed in 2018 to streamline…
Read More

APS’s Electric Feel – Bringing Potential Lawsuit?

Arizona State Law Journal Blog
By Gabriela Berigan. In 2019, Arizona Public Service (APS) filed a Rate Application with the Arizona Corporation Commission (ACC), in which APS requested an increase to the  rate it can charge customers for usage. It requested an increase of around 5%, to recover $215.5 million spent on pollution control upgrades. During a three-day hearing in October 2021, the five-member ACC heard APS’s arguments for the proposed rate increase. In a 3-2 decision, however, the ACC cut the company’s equity from approximately 10% to 8.7%, or about a decrease of $119 million in annual revenue. The decision was unexpected as APS has not seen a rate decrease for 25 years. Background All public utilities are required to undergo utility ratemaking. Utility ratemaking is the process in which a public service commission…
Read More

Ninth Circuit Rules That Arizona Data Law Does Not Violate Copyright Law

Arizona State Law Journal Blog
By Alicia Curti. Does copyright law apply to data stored by automobile dealers? The Ninth Circuit addressed this question in CDK Global v. Brnovich, which arose from a new state law requiring automobile dealerships to share certain data with third parties. The Circuit Court upheld the state law because it found it consistent with federal copyright law, specifically the fair use doctrine. The structure of the United States government, consisting of a central federal government in addition to state governments, inherently gives rise to tension between federal law and state law. Fundamental constitutional principles and federal statutes are often implicated in state laws, and federal law (almost) always trumps state law. Federal courts often review state laws for consistency with federal requirements, and state laws are sometimes invalidated in this…
Read More

The Supreme Court Puts Climate Change and the Administrative State on Trial

Arizona State Law Journal Blog
By Dewey Warner. On October 29, the Supreme Court agreed to hear West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency. The case, a consolidation of four cases brought by coal and energy companies and Republican-led states, will scrutinize the power of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to regulate carbon emissions under the Clean Air Act. The plaintiffs contend that the Act does not provide a constitutional basis for such regulation. The Court’s decision to hear this case is a monumental one. It creates the potential for an outcome that would thwart meaningful climate change action while upending the federal government’s regulatory apparatus. If the Supreme Court rules in favor of these states and companies, it will have profound implications. THE CLEAN AIR ACT AND ITS PROGENY In 1963, Congress enacted the Clean…
Read More

Picking Up and Putting Down Heavy Objects: Arizona’s Regulation of Gym Contracts

Arizona State Law Journal Blog
By Ben Martin. WikiHow’s fantastic How to Get Out of a Gym Contract reads with the regulatory complexity you might expect from a law class on energy or taxes. And yet it's a complexity that the consumer may encounter when trying to cancel a gym membership. A simple consumer transaction can be made difficult to increase subscriber retention. As WikiHow explains, most states have laws regulating gym memberships. Arizona, for example, has laws mandating some cancellation refunds and preventing contracts of over three years. In April 2021, Governor Ducey signed HB 2697 to allow Arizonans to cancel contracts for gyms through email. Previously, gyms only needed to allow members to cancel through mail or in person. The Governor connected the bill to the pandemic, emphasizing the importance of Arizonans having…
Read More