Biden, Bostock, and Anti-Trans Legislation in Arizona

Arizona State Law Journal Blog
By Alexandra Eagle.A Rise in Anti-Trans LegislationIn the past year in the United States, state legislatures have proposed and passed a number of laws designed to limit or restrict trans folks’ (and especially trans youths’) access to healthcare and equal participation. More than a dozen state legislatures have sought specifically to limit the rights of trans women and girls to participate on sports teams aligned with their gender identities.Proponents of trans sports bans argue that such bans are necessary to “protect” cisgender women athletes from trans women who, due to their “superior” strength and athletic abilities, would dominate women’s athletics. Opponents of the bans point to emerging understandings of both gender and sex. For example, new social and biological research suggests gender and sex are nondeterminative of physical abilities and…
Read More

As “Amateurism” Hangs in the Balance for the NCAA and Student-Athletes, Supreme Court Set To Weigh in

Arizona State Law Journal Blog
By Jacob Pierce.  For the first time in 35 years, the United States Supreme Court will hear an antitrust matter involving the National Collegiate Athletic Association (“NCAA”). On March 31, 2021, the Court is set to hear oral arguments in a case called NCAA v. Alston. This case is significant because it has the potential to settle a landmark issue that has dominated college athletics coverage in the recent past—student-athletes’ right to compensation.  How Did NCAA v. AlstonReach the Court? Prior to reaching the Supreme Court, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the United States District Court’s decision holding the NCAA cannot outright restrict or limit its member institutions from giving student-athletes non-cash benefits for the pursuit of academics. Under this holding, universities would be permitted to give benefits…
Read More

The “Remain In Mexico” Program

Arizona State Law Journal Blog
By Iris (Yeonjae) Lim.The Trump administration dramatically changed the asylum system during the past four years, and with the new Biden administration, asylum seekers at the U.S.-Mexico border are hoping for a change. More specifically, many people are wondering what Biden’s administration is going to do with the Migrant Protection Protocol (MPP) Program, more commonly known as the “Remain in Mexico” Program. Usually, someone who wants to enter the U.S. needs to have the appropriate visa; however, someone seeking asylum may approach the border without one and go through an additional process instead. Asylum seekers go through an interview, and if approved, proceed with the immigration adjudication process. Many of them are often detained during that process and, before the Trump administration, waited in the U.S. during that time period.…
Read More

Essentializing Labor Before, During, and After the Coronavirus Pandemic

2020, Past Issues, Print, Volume 52 (2020) Issue 4 (Winter)
Deepa Das Acevedo*Full Article.AbstractIn the era of COVID-19, the term essential labor has become part of our daily lexicon. Between March and May 2020, essential labor was not just the only kind of paid labor occurring across most of the United States; it was also, many argued, the only thing preventing utter economic and humanitarian collapse. As a result of this sudden significance, legal scholars, workers’ advocates, and politicians have scrambled to articulate exactly what makes essential labor “essential.” Some commentators have also argued that the rise of essential labor as a conceptual category disrupts—or should disrupt—longstanding patterns in the way the nation regulates work.Contrary to this emerging narrative, this Article argues that essentiality is not at all new to the way we conceptualize and regulate labor in the United…
Read More

Substance Use Disorder Discrimination and the CARES Act: Using Disability Law To Inform Part 2 Rulemaking

2020, Past Issues, Print, Volume 52 (2020) Issue 4 (Winter)
Kelly K. Dineen* & Elizabeth Pendo**Full Article.IntroductionSubstance use disorder (SUD) is a chronic health condition[1]—like people with other chronic health conditions, people with SUDs experience periods of remission and periods of exacerbation or recurrence.[2] Unlike people with most other chronic conditions, people with SUDs may be more likely to garner law enforcement attention than medical attention during a recurrence. They are also chronically disadvantaged by pervasive social stigma, discrimination, and structural inequities. The COVID-19 pandemic has had devastating consequences for people with SUDs, who are at higher risk for both contracting the SARS-CoV-19 virus and experiencing poorer outcomes.[3] Meanwhile, there are early indications that pandemic conditions have led to new and increased drug use,[4] and overdose deaths are surging.[5] More than ever, people with SUDs need access to evidence-based treatment…
Read More

Bankruptcy as Consumer Protection: The Case of Student Loans

2020, Past Issues, Print, Volume 52 (2020) Issue 4 (Winter)
John Patrick Hunt* Full Article. Abstract Over 300,000 student loan borrowers have applied to the Department of Education for administrative relief from federal student loans on the ground that they were deceived or otherwise victimized by their schools. The Department adopted relatively borrower-friendly rules for this process in 2016. But under Secretary DeVos, the Department changed course and adopted new rules that make it “nearly impossible” for student borrowers to prevail. After a presidential veto of a resolution that would have stopped the new rules, they went into effect on July 1, 2020. With victimized students effectively deprived of administrative relief, bankruptcy provides at least a partial solution. Many such borrowers will be candidates for bankruptcy: The median loan default rate at for-profit colleges sued or investigated for wrongdoing against…
Read More

The Personal Responsibility Pandemic: Centering Solidarity in Public Health and Employment Law

2020, Past Issues, Print, Volume 52 (2020) Issue 4 (Winter)
ByLindsay F. Wiley* and Samuel R. Bagenstos**Full Article.IntroductionOur nation’s response to the coronavirus pandemic has revealed fundamental flaws in our legal regimes governing both public health and employment. Public health orders have called on individuals to make sacrifices to protect society as a whole. Simple fairness dictates that the burdens should be shared as widely as the benefits. And the case for burden-sharing does not rest on fairness alone. Public health measures are more likely to succeed when those who are subject to them understand them as fair[1] and when their cooperation is supported.[2] Predictably, our pandemic response has placed disproportionate burdens on those who are already disadvantaged due to economic, racial, gender, disability, immigration, and criminal injustice.[3] Elected officials have asked each of us to take personal responsibility for…
Read More

The Forgotten “Student” in “Student– Athlete”: Why a New Cause of Action Is Needed To Remind Universities that Education Comes First

2020, Past Issues, Print, Volume 52 (2020) Issue 4 (Winter)
By Jacob Abrahamian*Full Article.I. IntroductionIn January 2019, the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) found the University of Missouri guilty of academic misconduct and imposed severe penalties on its football, baseball, and softball programs.[1] A two-year investigation by the NCAA revealed that a tutor had completed academic coursework for twelve of Missouri’s student–athletes, including having completed an entire course for one student.[2] The penalties were harsh; the NCAA banned each program for one year, vacated records from when the twelve athletes participated, reduced scholarship money, restricted recruiting, and imposed fines, among other punishments.[3] After an appeal, the NCAA upheld its sanctions in full.[4] Fans of the Missouri Tigers were outraged by the decision, but not because they doubted that violations had occurred.[5] In fact, Missouri officials admitted to the misconduct.[6]Instead, the…
Read More

Commuted Sentences: Could You Ask for More?

2020, Past Issues, Print, Volume 52 (2020) Issue 4 (Winter)
By Austin Moylan*Full Article.I. IntroductionThe United States is home to approximately 330 million people.[1] Strikingly, 2.3 million of them are behind bars.[2] For every 100,000 people in the United States, nearly 700 are in prison, an incarceration rate unmatched by any other country.[3] And despite having only 4% of the world’s population, the United States has an estimated one-third of the world’s prisoners serving life sentences.[4]The problems caused by mass incarceration are varied and significant. Annual spending on corrections at the state level alone totaled almost $57 billion in 2015.[5] And there appears to be little payoff either, as recidivism rates remain high; three quarters of those released from prison will be arrested within five years and over half will end up back in prison.[6] The lack of payoff is…
Read More

Bivens or Nothing: Constitutional Torts and Cross-Border Shootings

2020, Past Issues, Print, Volume 52 (2020) Issue 4 (Winter)
By Ben Shattuck* Full Article. “It is a general and indisputable rule, that where there is a legal right, there is also a legal remedy by suit or action at law, whenever that right is invaded.”[1]   “Bivens is a relic of the heady days in which this Court assumed common‑law powers to create causes of action.”[2] Introduction On June 7, 2010, fifteen-year-old Sergio Adrián Hernández Güereca (Hernández) was playing with a group of friends in the cement culvert separating El Paso, Texas, and Ciudad Juarez, Chihuahua, Mexico.[3] The boys were allegedly playing a game in which they would run up the incline of the culvert and touch the barbed-wire fence separating the United States and Mexico and then run back into the culvert.[4] While the boys were playing, United States…
Read More